3 tests, few answers: The not-so-simple world of worker classification
Will the IRS, DOL or state deem your worker a contractor or employee?
INSIGHT ARTICLE |
Authored by RSM US LLP
We know that the middle market is a strong driver of job growth. Determining the best time to add new workers is complicated—do you hire long or add workers alongside demand? And are those workers full-time employees or independent contractors? The use of independent contractors has grown in recent years as businesses and workers embraced the flexibility these arrangements may provide. A gap in wage reporting and taxation was an unintended consequence and the IRS, U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and states are taking a harder look at how companies classify workers.
Are your workers properly classified? There are three tests to help determine the proper classification of a worker:
- The common law test
- The ABC test
- The economic realities test
In some situations, you may need to consider all three tests to determine a worker’s classification and there are few bright lines among them.
The common law test
The common law test is typically considered the standard bearer for worker classification. Using the common law test, the IRS, and many state agencies, looks at three general factors to determine the degree of direction and control you have over the worker in question.
The three factors are:
Relationship of parties
Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the payer?
Are there written contracts or employee-type benefits?
Will the relationship continue, and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?
An independent contractor
is typically judged by the end result or completed work.
An independent contractor
tends to have significant investment in his or her own business, and is not reimbursed for expenses related to performing that service.
An independent contractor
typically has a written contract that is specific to the services provided, not simply claiming independent contractor status.
Relevant evidence in all three categories described above must be weighed and evaluated within the context of the business. Some factors may indicate that the worker is an independent contractor, while others may suggest an employee classification. No single factor or set number of factors determine the classification of the worker and some factors may be relevant in one situation, but not in another. The key in making a determination is to consider the entire relationship and the extent of the right to direct and control the services provided by the worker.
The common law test is specifically applied in relation to income tax withholding, federal unemployment tax, state unemployment tax and FICA tax, among others.
So, if the common law test covers federal and state income and unemployment, why are there two more tests? Some state employment tax agencies wanted a more stringent tool to assess worker classification and so they created what is commonly referred to as the ABC test.
The ABC test
The ABC test more clearly distinguishes between a worker who is personally performing services for your business versus a worker who is doing the work of his or her own business for the benefit of your business. What does that mean?
If you have a worker on-site, providing similar services to those provided by your employees or services aligned with your business, you likely have an employee, not an independent contractor.
The ABC test looks at up to three factors:
The worker is free from control or direction of the performance of his work, both under contract of service and in fact.
The service is either outside the usual course of the business for which such service is performed, or it is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which such service is performed.
The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.
Under the ABC test, if you have an information technology (IT) business and a contractor provides IT installation services to your clients, that worker would not pass the B factor. However, if you have a contractor providing regular building maintenance for your IT business, that worker would pass the B factor. And yet, if that building maintenance person provides maintenance solely for your IT company and no others, that same worker would not pass the C factor.
The ABC test is used by the majority of states and applies to state income tax withholding and state unemployment tax withholding.
The economic realities test
The economic realities test focuses on whether the worker is economically dependent on the employer or is actually in business for him or herself.
The economic realities test looks at:
- The extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business
- The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill
- The extent of the relative investment of the employer and worker
- Whether the work performed requires special skills and initiative
- The permanency of the relationship
- The degree of control exercised or retained by the employer
As with the common law and ABC tests, there is no single determining factor; each factor is analyzed in relation to the others. The DOL applies the economic realities test broadly to ensure that individuals are protected as employees under several federal employment acts including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Depending on the facts and circumstance of each worker, you may get different results from each test. Thus, you may wish to evaluate all three tests collectively, where applicable, to determine the proper classification of a worker. This approach will provide greater protection in the event of a worker classification audit.
Getting it right
Proper worker classification is important to you, to your workers and to the government. Growing businesses need to be certain that new workers are treated appropriately under the law. The consequences can range from administrative hassles to significant penalties.
If you believe you have improperly classified workers, voluntary disclosure programs may be available to help you correct past errors and minimize penalties.
Download a print-friendly version of this article.
Call us at (800) 624-2400 or fill out the form below and we'll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by Tim Ellenwood and originally appeared on 2021-09-20.
2021 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each is separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/about us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.
Weinlander Fitzhugh is a proud member of the RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.
Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise and technical resources.
For more information on how Weinlander Fitzhugh can assist you, please call (989) 893-5577.